Showing posts with label old testament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label old testament. Show all posts

Preaching from the Old Testament Review

Preaching from the Old Testament
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
The author of these thirty-two short chapters begins and ends with the assumption that problems we experience with the Old Testament are our problem, not the Bible's. This subordinating of the Bible reader to the well-weathered book he holds in his hand opens doors, not to forced harmonisations of problematic passages, but to fresh reappraisal of difficult texts on their own terms.
A clue to the author's approach to preaching is found at the start, for in between her introduction and the difficult texts she selects from 'Narratives and Law', 'Writings', and 'Prophets and Lamentations' comes a first chapter entitled 'The Holy One of God'. It contains the programmatic statement that the essential thing to be said about great preachers is that they 'talk mostly about God and not about human problems'. This statement then gives way to some of Achtemeier's own 'talk about God'. This comes in the form of a brief definition of and apology for the God of the Old Testament, who turns out to be somewhat different than the nasty-minded death-dealer of some popular belief. The Holy One of Israel is, in the end, the God who saves. Here, Achtemeier is framing the more atomistic discussions of particular texts which follow in a meta-narrative that will provide sense to and context to each one of them.
Having prepared the frame, Achtemeier plunges into her chosen texts, beginning with 'He shall rule over you', of Genesis 3.16. This first example is instructive for her approach to other texts. Each chapter has two parts, 'Plumbing the Text' and 'Shaping the Sermon'. This pattern becomes helpfully familiar to the reader as one moves through the book. It signals the author's methodology for moving from text to sermon. For Achtemeier, one begins with the text, allowing it to define and address its own concerns.
Her two-part presentation works like this: first, she locates the difficulty within its context, which by itself dissolves some of its scandal ('That such domination over the female was not the Creator God's intention in the beginning is clear from Gen. 2.') Second, she engages with her supposed audience, bringing contemporary issues under the light of the biblical text she analyses. Following this, she sometimes ventures outside the 'Plumbing/Shaping' format and into New Testament passages which attend to the same issues raised by her Old Testament text. Occasionally, she has recourse to moderately critical stances which illustrate how scholars deal with matters that she treats in this book at an intentionally more popular level. In the case of Genesis 3 and gender roles, she offers that the Pastoral Epistles are 'recognized by all but conservative scholars to be Pauline pseudepigrapha' and are concerned with intensely local issues. Achtemeier allows herself to be understood to mean, though she does not explicitly say so, that a pseudepigraphic New Testament text is less determinative for modern readers than an authentically Pauline one might have been. However, she has no time to parse the details of her occasionally broad-brush sketchings of the critical landscape. It is not her intention to do so, and readers who expect more on this count will be disappointed.
Her main point is usually contextual. If apostolic instruction in the Pastoral Epistles appears to contradict this point, further information will help lower the profile of that tension. The local leaders behind the rudely subordinationist texts in I-II Timothy and Titus were dealing with women who had been seduced by Gnostic heretics. Those shepherds would certainly not want such individuals teaching in the church. What is more, they were no hardened misogynists, for 'we also would not!'.
In this way, Achtemeier weaves text and context into a whole which adds greater depth to each and repeatedly draws the reader and his generation into the picture. If this also resolves some of the perceived difficulty of the text itself, then that passage has become more amenable to productive preaching. This the objective of her book.
An example in addition to Genesis 3 is suggestive. If there is a text with more a more compelling history in Jewish and Christian reflection than Genesis 22, is difficult to say which one that might be. The Akedah, or 'Binding of Isaac' is rich with pathos and ripe for dissent. The divine request for human sacrifice, the willingness of a father to murder (or 'offer', as the text might prefer to say it) his own son, and the absence of Sarah at such a family-shaping moment practically beg for comment and/or complaint.
Achtemeier is methodologically explicit in a way that will endear her to her more cautious readers and disillusion those who would deconstruct a text along just such seams and silences: 'We should not speculate about what the text does not say.' She also draws her reader into the passages rather remote personae: 'In short, Abraham and Sarah are spasmodic believers, who do a lot of questioning of God, as we ourselves often do.' There is also a reserved theological and pastoral reflection: 'We must not think, however, that God's test of our trust is behind every single affliction that we suffer. In the Scriptures, God tests his servants when his purpose is at stake.' And then once more, Achtemeier follows the resonances that make up what theologians with some hesitation still call 'typology' into the New Testament. Her phrasing alludes to her prior discussion of the Genesis text's intimacies and echoes the cadence of the Hebrew narrative itself: 'Surely, in the story of Jesus we have the picture of a Father and a Son, a Son and Father, going both of them together to Moriah.'
The collecting and explanation of difficult biblical texts constitutes a genre, of which this book is just one exemplar. One thinks, for example, of the various entries of Walter Kaiser, Jr., who must certainly be the modern dean of the discipline and the master of making the rough places smooth. Practitioners of the task sometimes employ assumptions and methodologies that are more conservative than those of Achtemeier, as do both Kaiser and Gleason Archer. It is essentially a commitment to the Bible's coherence that generates a concern to explain its difficulties. The result is that this genre has little representation on the more critical extreme of the interpretative spectrum.
Reading through Elizabeth Achtemeier's PREACHING HARD TEXTS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, this reviewer is left with two unfulfilled wishes. First, to converse with her, for her hints and allusions leave so much unsaid, yet her turn of a phrase leaves this reviewer with no doubt regarding her mastery of the critical discussion surrounding her chosen texts, a conversation that she summarises but will not detail. Second, to hear her preach, for her sections on 'Forming the Sermon' are evocative of real sermons well preached and of a sensitivity to the soul of her listener, now turned reader. Sadly, neither of these options is possible, for Dr. Achtemeier died during the preparation of this review.
For those wishing quick resolution of biblical difficulties, this book will disappoint, as it must. But for those wishing that their reading of those texts knew further depth and texture, as for those wanting to know how to nudge a fascinating biblical text in the direction of productive proclamation, it will be a treasure. It is not, one hastens to say, a treasure of secret manoeuvres for cutting the Gordian knot, but rather an inventory of models for preaching through, in spite of, and sometimes by means of the very difficulties which the Bible unsparingly presents us.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Preaching from the Old Testament



Buy Now

Click here for more information about Preaching from the Old Testament

Read More...

Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament Review

Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
`Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament', edited by G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson supports the idea that given any approach to the examination of the New Testament you may think of, someone has written a book about it. And a superb book it is, if you have need for an examination of this subject from almost every angle. I say almost, because there is actually one thing I would like to have seen in this book, and it is not there. More on this anon.
For the lay reader, be aware that this is a scholarly book, with all the Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, and (I suspect) even Coptic terms used freely, just when I've gotten in the habit of tracking down Greek, I have to deal with two even more difficult languages. I mention that primarily for those who are allergic to footnotes and phrases in languages other than English. Otherwise, I am delighted in how easy the reading is in all the contributions from eighteen (18) major scholars on the New Testament.
Much of this is attributable to the marching orders given to the writers by the two editors. This list of guidelines makes the diverse contributions very uniform, which contributes to the value of this book as the guide to a specialized type of Bible study based on this book's subject.
Anyone who has tracked down more than a handful of OT passages used in the NT will realize that the NT writers often take some liberties with their interpretations, reading in a prophesy about Jesus which, in the original text actually referred to something completely different. And, one has also run across a wide range of different ways in which OT texts are used, from `exact' quotes to paraphrases to allusions.
The editors address this range by asking all authors to address their OT citations from at least five different points of view. These are:
1.What is the NT context of the citation? What is the genre and literary structure of the book or chapter?
2.What is the OT context of the citation? Do these Markan citations come directly from Exodus, for example, or are they quoted from Isaiah's use of Exodus verses?
3.How was the OT quote handled or interpreted by Second Temple Judaism, or early Judaism in general?
4.From what text is the OT quotation copied. The Septuagint (LXX), the Masoretic text, or a Targum (scripture translated into Aramaic or Coptic).
5.What is the ultimate use or connection being made by the NT author's use of the OT. Is it simply to emote a connection, is it a use of a common OT idiom, is it a parable use, shorthand to evoking an OT story, or is there a belief that events in NT times fulfill a specific OT prophecy.
Of course, many commentaries on individual NT books do this as well, but most do not go into detail on points 2, 3, and 4.
In looking at those parts of the NT I know best, I find this book delivers everything it promises on these five points, but that the book cannot replace good commentaries and study Bibles for NT books. In looking at one of the most famous uses of OT scripture in Luke, at 4:18 - 19, where Jesus teaches from Isaiah 61:1 - 2, the authors, David Pao and Eckhard Schnabel cover all the editors' points admirably, including references to important opinions by famous scholars such as Rudolph Bultmann. For this passage and for all others in this chapter on Luke, the actual passage is NOT presented in any translation. Therefore, one has to have a copy of the Bible open to the passage, as you read the authors' interpretation of it. Less important is the fact that the explanation of this section of Luke on Jesus' teaching in the Nazareth synagogue says nothing about the puzzling climax, where the congregation turns on Jesus. But that is a logical limitation of the approach, and is not relevant to the subject of the book.
The introduction to Lucan passages was illuminating, as it tells us that even though one of Luke's primary objectives was to show the resolution of OT prophesies, Luke actually uses fewer OT quotes than Matthew. This is rarely discussed in commentaries on Luke.
So, especially with regard to the synoptic Gospels, this would be an excellent book to use as a guide to OT references in the NT. For the scholar, there is the usual tower of bibliographical references after each article, plus the usual index to Biblical citations at the back of the book. There was just one thing I wanted which is missing. This is a `reverse' index, if you will, of OT books, with the number and locations of where verses are cited in the NT. The reason for wishing such an index is as a guide to selecting which OT books may best be studied together, as with Luke and Deuteronomy (some commentators claim the 10 chapter journey of Jesus to Jerusalem is patterned after Deuteronomy).
Ultimately, this is a great reference if you make a habit of studying NT scriptures in depth, as either a pastor or bible study teacher.


Click Here to see more reviews about: Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Readers of the New Testament often encounter quotes or allusions to Old Testament stories and prophecies that are unfamiliar or obscure. In order to fully understand the teachings of Jesus and his followers, it is important to understand the large body of Scripture that preceded and informed their thinking. Leading evangelical scholars G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson have brought together a distinguished team to provide readers with a comprehensive commentary on Old Testament quotations, allusions, and echoes that appear from Matthew through Revelation. College and seminary students, pastors, scholars, and interested lay readers will want to add this unique commentary to their reference libraries. ContributorsCraig L. Blomberg (Denver Seminary) on MatthewRikk E. Watts (Regent College) on MarkDavid W. Pao (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) and Eckhard J. Schnabel (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) on LukeAndreas J. Köstenberger (Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary) on John I. Howard Marshall (University of Aberdeen) on ActsMark A. Seifrid (Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) on Romans Roy E. Ciampa (Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary) and Brian S. Rosner (Moore Theological College) on 1 CorinthiansPeter Balla (Károli Gáspár Reformed University, Budapest) on 2 Corinthians Moisés Silva (author of Philippians in the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament) on Galatians and Philippians Frank S. Thielman (Beeson Divinity School) on Ephesians G. K. Beale (Wheaton College Graduate School) on ColossiansJeffrey A. D. Weima (Calvin Theological Seminary) on 1 and 2 Thessalonians Philip H. Towner (United Bible Societies) on 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus George H. Guthrie (Union University) on Hebrews D. A. Carson (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) on the General Epistles G. K. Beale (Wheaton College Graduate School) and Sean M. McDonough (Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary) on Revelation

Buy NowGet 38% OFF

Click here for more information about Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament

Read More...

The Right Doctrine from the Wrong Texts?: Essays on the Use of the Old Testament in the New Review

The Right Doctrine from the Wrong Texts: Essays on the Use of the Old Testament in the New
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
The battle over hermeneutics seems to be wage on this one issue: How did the New Testament writers use the Old Testament? In one volume, Greg Beale, formerly of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (and one of my professors), but now Wheaton Graduate School, has compiled twenty-two articles, each dealing with various aspects and concerns over the use of the Old Testament in the New. Beale writes, "The purpose of this book is to present various perspectives concerning the hermeneutical issue whether or not Jesus and the apostles quoted Old Testament texts with respect for their broader Old Testament context" (7). Each essay is from a well-known scholar in the field who seeks to answer the question "did the New Testament writers quote or refer to Old Testament passages that are consistent with or contradictory to the original Old Testament passage?"
The reader will find this volume extremely helpful. The essays are not just theoretical; they show how the particular author applies their hermeneutical or linguistic perspective(s). This book is quite unique for it unswervingly focuses on "exegetical methodology instead of theology" (9).
Beale admits that more space is given to articles arguing in favor of the New Testament using the Old Testament text contextually. Although this view is offered at various levels and with varying nuances throughout the literature (see the "Selected Bibliography"), it is the minority view. Thus, G. Beale purposely chooses more voices affirming and demonstrating that New Testament writers were faithful to the immediate and broader contextual concerns of the original Old Testament writers. Nevertheless, the breath of perspectives these essays offer will help the reader to enter the discussion with integrity.
Understanding of this subject is a must for students of the Bible. Since the integrity of the Christian message is wrapped up in the integrity of the New Testament writers, this hermeneutical and exegetical issue (debate) must be entered by all who profess to teach and proclaim the Gospel. Please don't allow the high quality and technical nature of some of these articles to cause Bible students and pastors to overlook this volume--the issue is too great to be ignored by all "users" of the Bible! Greg Beale has done a great service to the Church by compiling these essays and making them accessible in one volume.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Right Doctrine from the Wrong Texts: Essays on the Use of the Old Testament in the New



Buy NowGet 33% OFF

Click here for more information about The Right Doctrine from the Wrong Texts: Essays on the Use of the Old Testament in the New

Read More...